<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FlairBuilder 1.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wireframes.linowski.ca/2009/05/flairbuilder-10/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wireframes.linowski.ca/2009/05/flairbuilder-10/</link>
	<description>Because every IA has something funky up their sleeve</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 15:18:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: msallin</title>
		<link>http://wireframes.linowski.ca/2009/05/flairbuilder-10/comment-page-1/#comment-31015</link>
		<dc:creator>msallin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 18:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wireframes.linowski.ca/?p=869#comment-31015</guid>
		<description>Funny you say that, that&#039;s the reason I&#039;m considering switching from Balsamiq to FB.  Basamiq wireframes are just too sketchy to be persuasive at my organization. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny you say that, that&#039;s the reason I&#039;m considering switching from Balsamiq to FB.  Basamiq wireframes are just too sketchy to be persuasive at my organization.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessica Petersen</title>
		<link>http://wireframes.linowski.ca/2009/05/flairbuilder-10/comment-page-1/#comment-1542</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessica Petersen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 20:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wireframes.linowski.ca/?p=869#comment-1542</guid>
		<description>The one thing I don&#039;t like about this is the fact that it&#039;s not sketchy. Too often the wireframes could be mistaken for finished designs. 
 
I like the direction they&#039;re taking though. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The one thing I don&#039;t like about this is the fact that it&#039;s not sketchy. Too often the wireframes could be mistaken for finished designs. </p>
<p>I like the direction they&#039;re taking though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jakub Linowski</title>
		<link>http://wireframes.linowski.ca/2009/05/flairbuilder-10/comment-page-1/#comment-1247</link>
		<dc:creator>Jakub Linowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 16:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wireframes.linowski.ca/?p=869#comment-1247</guid>
		<description>Hey Ian. Could you elaborate? I don&#039;t mind seeing negative criticism on here, but please try to share your argumentation and make the discussion a bit more constructive. No? Cheers. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Ian. Could you elaborate? I don&#39;t mind seeing negative criticism on here, but please try to share your argumentation and make the discussion a bit more constructive. No? Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ian</title>
		<link>http://wireframes.linowski.ca/2009/05/flairbuilder-10/comment-page-1/#comment-1246</link>
		<dc:creator>ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 10:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wireframes.linowski.ca/?p=869#comment-1246</guid>
		<description>Ironic really that this is one of the least intuitive interfaces I&#039;ve seen for quite a while. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ironic really that this is one of the least intuitive interfaces I&#039;ve seen for quite a while.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sherrod</title>
		<link>http://wireframes.linowski.ca/2009/05/flairbuilder-10/comment-page-1/#comment-1232</link>
		<dc:creator>Sherrod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 18:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wireframes.linowski.ca/?p=869#comment-1232</guid>
		<description>Now THIS looks pretty innovative. Wireframes? Check. Interactive? Check. Client Viewer? Check. I can&#039;t wait to try this out. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now THIS looks pretty innovative. Wireframes? Check. Interactive? Check. Client Viewer? Check. I can&#039;t wait to try this out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

