Comments on: WireMolecules http://wireframes.linowski.ca/2010/05/wiremolecules/ Because every IA has something funky up their sleeve Mon, 06 Feb 2012 15:18:23 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: tubedownloader.com http://wireframes.linowski.ca/2010/05/wiremolecules/comment-page-1/#comment-20310 tubedownloader.com Thu, 20 May 2010 07:47:18 +0000 http://wireframes.linowski.ca/?p=2377#comment-20310 <i>I really like this idea. I've been tormented by the "layout" inherent in traditional wireframes. I think that is a necessary step, but it comes after determining order of importance and proximity and that conversation is elusive when people are focused on layout.</i> +1 I really like this idea. I've been tormented by the "layout" inherent in traditional wireframes. I think that is a necessary step, but it comes after determining order of importance and proximity and that conversation is elusive when people are focused on layout.
+1

]]> By: Kristian http://wireframes.linowski.ca/2010/05/wiremolecules/comment-page-1/#comment-20302 Kristian Thu, 20 May 2010 05:31:19 +0000 http://wireframes.linowski.ca/?p=2377#comment-20302 I'm having trouble understanding how this exercise would bring any clarity to the design process. I just recently railed against creating obtuse and confusing design documentation that doesn't explicitly (and briskly) the project forward. This seems like another self-indulgent exercise in search of a useful application. This might be useful as an internal tool to gain alignment across a team, but I would not suggest showing this to a client. More thoughts here:<a href="http://www.kaplusa.com/blog/2010/05/a-prototype-is-worth-a-thousand-wireframes/" target="_blank">http://www.kaplusa.com/blog/2010/05/a-prototype-i...</a> I'm having trouble understanding how this exercise would bring any clarity to the design process. I just recently railed against creating obtuse and confusing design documentation that doesn't explicitly (and briskly) the project forward. This seems like another self-indulgent exercise in search of a useful application. This might be useful as an internal tool to gain alignment across a team, but I would not suggest showing this to a client. More thoughts here:http://www.kaplusa.com/blog/2010/05/a-prototype-i…

]]> By: Derek http://wireframes.linowski.ca/2010/05/wiremolecules/comment-page-1/#comment-20265 Derek Wed, 19 May 2010 21:48:24 +0000 http://wireframes.linowski.ca/?p=2377#comment-20265 For someone concerned w/ Interaction design, I'm surprised at using ctrl to trigger navigation on your site. I ctrl-click links in new tabs, ctrl-c and ctrl-v interesting bits, etc, and your menu keeps bouncing around when I do. For someone concerned w/ Interaction design, I'm surprised at using ctrl to trigger navigation on your site.

I ctrl-click links in new tabs, ctrl-c and ctrl-v interesting bits, etc, and your menu keeps bouncing around when I do.

]]> By: Boz http://wireframes.linowski.ca/2010/05/wiremolecules/comment-page-1/#comment-20257 Boz Wed, 19 May 2010 18:29:20 +0000 http://wireframes.linowski.ca/?p=2377#comment-20257 I really like this idea. I've been tormented by the "layout" inherent in traditional wireframes. I think that is a necessary step, but it comes after determining order of importance and proximity and that conversation is elusive when people are focused on layout. I really like this idea. I've been tormented by the "layout" inherent in traditional wireframes. I think that is a necessary step, but it comes after determining order of importance and proximity and that conversation is elusive when people are focused on layout.

]]> By: yannlossouarn http://wireframes.linowski.ca/2010/05/wiremolecules/comment-page-1/#comment-20244 yannlossouarn Wed, 19 May 2010 16:16:32 +0000 http://wireframes.linowski.ca/?p=2377#comment-20244 Errr... Isn't that what we call a "zoning" ? Errr… Isn't that what we call a "zoning" ?

]]>